Symbol over Substance
By Jesse Reynolds,
GeneWatch (Sep-Oct 2009)
| 10. 22. 2009
Despite over a decade of hype, cloning-based stem cell research has offered little in the way of scientific progress. It has been more symbol than substance; more moving target than realistic goal. However, by complicating both politics and policy, is has been a monkey wrench in the gears for progressive advocates of responsible biotechnologies.
Although there had been previous technological and policy developments in reproductive cloning, the 1996 birth of Dolly the Sheep - the first cloned mammal - catalyzed widespread concern and numerous laws about human reproductive cloning throughout the world. It quickly became clear that, outside of a handful of extreme techno-enthusiasts, reproductive human cloning had few defenders. Prohibitions in every nation, and even internationally, seemed to be just around the corner.
But two years after Dolly's birth, scientists led by James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin isolated human embryonic stem cells. These cells' power to differentiate into any tissue type - a characteristic called pluripotency - represented the foundation of a potential new type of medicine, in which cellular therapies could be used to repair the...
Related Articles
By Priyanka Runwal, Chemical and Engineering News | 08.05.2024
Saritee Sanodiya, 26, has spent countless days wondering if she’ll ever live a “normal” life. Growing up, Sanodiya often missed school, frequenting the hospital for sudden, life-threatening drops in her hemoglobin levels and excruciating pain in her joints. High fever...
It’s been a busy couple of months in biopolitics, with developments in the US, UK, China, Japan, and implicitly on Mars. Time for a brief roundup.
• • •
Bioethics needs an update
The National Research Act is now 50 years old. It was signed into law on July 12, 1974, as a direct response to publicity about the 1932 “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” The Hastings Bioethics Forum celebrated its anniversary with an...
Image courtesy National Human Genome Research Institute
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is supposed to encourage effective medical advances while also ensuring that patients and research subjects are protected. This dual mandate demands tricky judgment calls that are made more difficult by outside pressures of several kinds, political, judicial, and especially commercial. This April story at Bloomberg examines one deeply troubling pattern of regulatory capture:
Americans Are Paying Billions to Take Drugs That Don’t Work
Companies are increasingly...
By Sarah Kliff and Azeen Ghorayshi, The New York Times | 07.15.2024