Opening the door to new high-tech eugenics is absolute folly
By Richard Hayes,
Financial Times
| 07. 18. 2018
The Nuffield Council’s approval of the creation of genetically modified children is inexcusable (“ Human gene editing morally permissible, says ethics study”, July 17). The most authoritative international agreement on human genetic technologies to date, the Council of Europe’s 1997 Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, prohibits heritable human genetic modification. The absolute folly of opening the door to new forms of high-tech eugenics, in a world already wracked with inequality and conflict, is self-evident to world leaders and to the average person on the street.
We can and should draw firm lines between the many benign, beneficent uses of genetic technology and those pernicious uses that would divide humanity against itself.
Dr. Richard Hayes
Executive Director Emeritus, Center for Genetics and Society, Berkeley, CA, US
###
Image via Max Pixel
Related Articles
By Bernice Lottering, Gene Online | 11.08.2024
South Africa’s updated health-research ethics guidelines, which now include heritable human genome editing, have sparked concern among scientists. The revisions, made in May but only recently gaining attention, outline protocols for modifying genetic material in sperm, eggs, or embryos—changes...
By Jim Thomas, Scan the Horizon | 11.19.2024
It’s the wee hours of 2nd November 2024 in Cali, Colombia. In a large UN negotiating hall Colombian Environment Minister Susana Muhamed has slammed down the gavel on a decision that should send a jolt through the AI policy world. ...
By Ned Pagliarulo, BioPharmaDive | 11.05.2024
A medicine built around a more precise form of CRISPR gene editing appeared to work as designed in its first clinical trial test, developer Beam Therapeutics said Tuesday. But the death of a trial participant could renew concerns about an older...
By Ruth Retassie, PET | 10.21.2024