This is Why you Shouldn’t Believe that Exciting New Medical Study
By Julia Belluz,
Vox
| 03. 23. 2015
Untitled Document
In 2003, researchers writing in the American Journal of Medicine discovered something that should change how you think about medical news. They looked at 101 studies published in top scientific journals between 1979 and 1983 that claimed a new therapy or medical technology was very promising. Only five, they found out, made it to market within a decade. Only one (ACE inhibitors, a pharmaceutical drug) was still extensively used at the time of their publication.
One.
But you'd never know that from reading the press. Take a recent miracle procedure for multiple sclerosis. MS is a degenerative disease with no cure. In sufferers, the immune system attacks the protective layer around the nerves, disturbing the communication between brain and body — and causing a cascade of devastating symptoms: unsteady and jerking movements; loss of vision, bladder and bowel control; and eventually, early death.
In 2009, a breakthrough: a charming Italian researcher, Dr. Paolo Zamboni, claimed to have cured his wife's MS by "unblocking" the veins in her neck. He theorized MS wasn't an autoimmune disorder but a vascular one...
Related Articles
“Donald Trump” by Gage Skidmore
is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
On October 7, Donald Trump’s long-standing promotion of eugenics finally attracted widespread and prominent media attention. Here are a few examples, all posted just in the first hours after Trump’s harangue on a radio podcast about immigrants’ genetic propensity to murder:
- ‘Very sinister’: Trump stuns Republicans and Dems with on-air ‘bad genes’ rant, Kathleen Culliton, Raw Story, 10/7, 10:15 am
- Saying immigrants bring ‘bad genes’...
By Gary Marcus, The Guardian | 08.03.2024
By Julia Black and Margaux MacColl, The Information [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 07.19.2024
When venture capitalist Jack Abraham first began dating his wife, Gabriella Massamillo, he insisted on one condition: that when they were ready to have children, she’d be willing to conceive using in vitro fertilization. Abraham had lost both his mother...
Image courtesy National Human Genome Research Institute
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is supposed to encourage effective medical advances while also ensuring that patients and research subjects are protected. This dual mandate demands tricky judgment calls that are made more difficult by outside pressures of several kinds, political, judicial, and especially commercial. This April story at Bloomberg examines one deeply troubling pattern of regulatory capture:
Americans Are Paying Billions to Take Drugs That Don’t Work
Companies are increasingly...