A Radical ’70s-Era Group Is Relaunching to Help Scientists Get Political Under Trump
By Rebecca Onion,
Slate
| 08. 29. 2018
Advocates of science are in a bad place right now. Some days, in this Second Year of Trump, scientism—a blanket defense of science as a virtuous and almost holy exercise of objectivity and rationality—feels like the only natural response to the rising darkness. But, tempting as it might be, cheerleading for capital-S “Science” can’t be the answer. Science—as historians of science and practitioners of science and technology studies readily argue—is not an objective refuge; it’s shaped by politics just like any other human endeavor. How can we acknowledge that fact while still arguing for science’s authority and value?
From 1969 through 1989, the group Science for the People tried to do just that. Its members took “science has a politics” as a philosophical starting point and then used that understanding to push for radical change. Early on, the group protested weapons labs. Members worked with the Black Panther Party, helping with their free health clinics, and with the Young Lords Organization, assisting them in offering free lead-poisoning testing services. They sent equipment to Vietnamese scientists and helped Midwestern farmworkers...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 11.24.2024
Gig work in childcare, nursing, and transportation; non-invasive prenatal testing; gene editing; and space expeditions can all be attributed to one mistaken, pervasive assumption: that “we can innovate our way out of the thorniest problems, including reproductive ones” (22). In Reproductive Labor and Innovation: Against the Tech Fix in an Era of Hype, feminist political theorist Jennifer Denbow demonstrates why the U.S. has put so much of its hopes, and its money, on technological “innovations”––and why that hasn’t addressed...
By Arwa Mahdawi, The Guardian | 11.19.2024
Photo "Elon Musk Presenting Tesla's Fully Autonomous Future" by Steve Jurvetson on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Is Elon Musk the dinner party guest from hell? It sure seems that way. Not only is the man desperate for people to...
By Jantina de Vries, EthicsLab | 11.15.2024
The conversation around human heritable genome editing (HHGE) in South Africa is marked by controversy and conflicting interpretations of the law. At the center of this debate lies a team of lawyers based at a South African university, who have...
By Zeenat Beebeejaun, PET | 10.28.2024
Building on the 2016 BBC Panorama documentary 'Inside Britain's Fertility Business', which exposed the use of controversial fertility treatment add-ons in private fertility clinics (see BioNews 880), Manuela Perrotta's book, Biomedical Innovation in Fertility Care, unveils regulatory inadequacies...