Political Notes: CA bill protecting same-sex parents advances
By Matthew S. Bajko,
Bay Area Reporter
| 08. 27. 2015
Untitled Document
As a bill protecting the rights of same-sex parents who use sperm and egg donors advances in Sacramento, a new report is detailing the obstacles such households face in accessing infertility treatment.
The state Senate voted 29-2 August 17 to adopt Assembly Bill 960, known as the Equal Protection for All Families Act, authored by Assemblyman David Chiu (D-San Francisco), who is straight. It modernizes California law to protect families, particularly gay and lesbian couples, using assisted reproduction methods and would ensure that sperm and egg donors are not legally considered a parent.
Upon the legislation's becoming law, as Chiu's office has pointed out, unmarried couples using assisted reproduction to become parents would be recognized as such on the same terms as married parents from the moment their child is born. The bill would also remove the requirement from the state's family law that couples must involve a doctor when using assisted reproduction in order to ensure that the donor is not a parent.
The Assembly passed Chiu's bill in May, but due to several changes made to...
Related Articles
By Jessica Hamzelou, MIT Technology Review | 01.13.2025
Lisa Holligan already had two children when she decided to try for another baby. Her first two pregnancies had come easily. But for some unknown reason, the third didn’t. Holligan and her husband experienced miscarriage after miscarriage after miscarriage.
Like...
By Melissa Dahl, Slate | 01.13.2025
Mia used to say she’d never do in vitro fertilization. It’s a detail that feels significant now, looking back on the three long years that she and her husband, Chris, have spent trying to conceive. “When we first started trying...
By Tatiana Giovannucci, PET | 01.13.2025
Ten pregnant women and three others with their babies were repatriated to the Philippines after being pardoned by the Royal Government of Cambodia.
The women were recruited to act as surrogates in Cambodia, and were all pregnant at the time...
By Kristen V. Brown, The Atlantic | 01.15.2025
The first time Jamie Cassidy was pregnant, the fetus had a genetic mutation so devastating that she and her husband, Brennan, decided to terminate in the second trimester. The next time they tried for a baby, they weren’t taking chances...