New CRG Report: Genetic Privacy and Non-Forensic Biobanks
By Council for Responsible Genetics,
Council for Responsible Genetics
| 08. 12. 2014
The current structure of biobanks in the United States is missing substantial federal and state policies to address and resolve people’s privacy concerns as well as sufficient education for people about the laws that are there to protect their genetic privacy. Medical, research, and commercial DNA databases all generate privacy concerns largely because of the misunderstanding between what people anticipate from giving their genetic information to these biobanks and what actually occurs. Because of the various risks that are associated with non-forensic biobanks, it is necessary to have stringent regulations and federal oversight so that scientists may be able to use donated genetic data to research diseases without compromising the genetic privacy of donors as well as their close relatives.
The new CRG report: Do You Know Where Your DNA Is? Genetic Privacy and Non-Forensic Biobanks explores the various forms of biobanks in the US, their privacy limitations, the current state of regulation and the need for reform.
The report can be accessed at the following link and on the homepage of the CRG website: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/pageDocuments/L0Z6I8MLM3.pdf
Related Articles
By Ali Breland, The Atlantic | 08.20.2024
“Joining us now is Steve Sailer, who I find to be incredibly interesting, and one of the most talented noticers,” Charlie Kirk said on his internet show in October. Kirk, the 30-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, a right-wing...
By Matthew Rozsa, Salon | 09.15.2024
When a person with a uterus decides to freeze their eggs, any number of things can go wrong. Ice crystal can form, killing an otherwise viable ovum. A fertilized egg may fail to properly implant, or the egg may...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 09.09.2024
Image by Stephen Andrews from Unsplash
Yale agreed on Monday to pay dozens of patients who had filed lawsuits claiming that they had endured excruciatingly painful egg retrieval procedures after a nurse at its fertility clinic secretly swapped their anesthesia...
By Ari Schulman, The New York Times | 09.09.2024
There was immediate backlash when Alabama’s Supreme Court ruled in February that embryos created through in vitro fertilization qualified as children under the state’s wrongful death law. But it was a backlash as much from the right as from the...