Mitochondrial replacement techniques, Mexico and the legal unknowns
By César Palacios-González,
BioNews
| 04. 24. 2017
It is not every day that we can examine the details of the first use of a new reproductive technology. But the first live birth of a baby following the use of a mitochondrial replacement technique (MRT) in IVF last year gives a window into just this. The case (see BioNews 895) – with procedures carried out in both the US and Mexico – also raises legal questions.
The birth garnered a huge amount of attention after New Scientist magazine broke the news last September. MRT is a technique that aids women affected by a heritable mitochondrial disease to have genetically-related children free from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorders. These cause neuromuscular diseases that can have devastating effects, including heart and major organ failure, dementia, stroke, blindness, deafness, infant encephalopathy, and premature death.
From the moment the news broke until a paper detailing the case was published on 3 April this year (see BioNews 895), the only technical information we had about this experimental procedure came from three sources: a short conference abstract, press interviews...
Related Articles
By Ali Breland, The Atlantic | 08.20.2024
“Joining us now is Steve Sailer, who I find to be incredibly interesting, and one of the most talented noticers,” Charlie Kirk said on his internet show in October. Kirk, the 30-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, a right-wing...
By Matthew Rozsa, Salon | 09.15.2024
When a person with a uterus decides to freeze their eggs, any number of things can go wrong. Ice crystal can form, killing an otherwise viable ovum. A fertilized egg may fail to properly implant, or the egg may...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 09.09.2024
Image by Stephen Andrews from Unsplash
Yale agreed on Monday to pay dozens of patients who had filed lawsuits claiming that they had endured excruciatingly painful egg retrieval procedures after a nurse at its fertility clinic secretly swapped their anesthesia...
By Ari Schulman, The New York Times | 09.09.2024
There was immediate backlash when Alabama’s Supreme Court ruled in February that embryos created through in vitro fertilization qualified as children under the state’s wrongful death law. But it was a backlash as much from the right as from the...