How Editing RNA—Not DNA—Could Cure Disease in the Future
By Kristen V. Brown,
Gizmodo
| 03. 15. 2018
DNA is the code of life, and so advances that allow us to edit that code have unlocked vast potential, from simply editing away the buggy code of disease, to engineering animals that don’t spread illness, to, maybe one day in a distant future, creating so-called designer babies. But editing another essential molecular component of our biology—RNA, the messenger used by cells to turns DNA instructions into proteins—also holds great promise.
A slew of recent high-profile discoveries have focused on pairing the buzzy genetic engineering tool, CRISPR, with RNA editing. RNA is a sort of middleman that turns genetic instructions from DNA into proteins. Editing RNA could allow scientists to tweak how genes are expressed without making permanent changes to the genome itself—thus avoiding one of the scarier aspects of genetic engineering, because you’d be interfering with DNA’s instructions rather than editing DNA itself. RNA is ephemeral, which means changes to it could be reversed. And in some diseases, like a form of muscular dystrophy called myotonic dystrophy, mutant RNA is actually the root of the problem.
In October...
Related Articles
By Sarojini Nadimpally and Gargi Mishra, The Wire | 12.15.2024
In-vitro fertilisation (IVF) as assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been in vogue for quite a few decades now. While IVF has been hailed as a significant scientific advancement, with many advantages, here are some limitations which bear keeping in mind...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...
By Susan Dominus, The New York Times | 11.30.2024
In the days after Daphna Cardinale delivered her second child, she experienced a rare sense of calm and wonder. The feeling was a relief after so much worrying: She and her husband, Alexander, had tried for three years to conceive...