Genomic research is at risk from ‘race science’ activists’ discredited ideas
By Bill Newman and Demetra Georgiou,
The Guardian
| 11. 03. 2024
We were alarmed to read the findings of your investigation into an international network of “race science” activists seeking to influence public debate with discredited ideas on race and eugenics (Revealed: International ‘race science’ network secretly funded by US tech boss, 16 October).
As organisations representing leading researchers and clinicians working in human genetics, we can state unequivocally that race is a fluid social, historical and political construct with no biological or genetic basis. There is convincing evidence that there is more genetic variation within self-identified racial groups than there is between them. It is also widely recognised that the eugenics movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries was not based on scientific evidence, as set out recently by the Royal College of Physicians in a statement on the history of the UK’s eugenics movement.
We firmly believe that equality, equity, diversity, inclusion and respect for data privacy are central to improving healthcare through research. We recognise that it may not always be possible to prevent malicious actors from hacking datasets and databases and from making...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
By Dalton Conley, The New York Times | 03.13.2025
Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences.
Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter...
By Jamie Ducharme, TIME | 03.06.2025
After struggling for eight years to have a baby, Shannon Petersen and her husband decided to try in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2022. Their fertility doctor recommended a test that sounded like exactly what they needed. It promised to help...
By Jason Wilson, The Guardian | 03.03.2025
A natalist conference featuring speakers including self-described eugenicists and promoters of race science, apparently including the man behind a previously pseudonymous race-science influencer account, and the founder of a startup offering IQ screening for IVF embryos, will be held at...