Eugenics Is Still a Dangerous Idea
By Dorothy Roberts,
The Inquirer
| 05. 01. 2019
At the turn of the 20th century, U.S. scientists proposed the control of reproduction to advance society based on the idea that genes determine individuals’ socially relevant traits. In 1910, prominent biologist Charles Davenport defined this project, known as eugenics, as “the science of human improvement by better breeding.” The false claim that scientists can isolate, test for, and quantify inherited characteristics that determine success in an unequal society was essential to eugenicists’ theory that social inequality comes from biology.
Eugenicists’ ideas found fertile ground in America, where they provided a scientific framework to justify the efforts of U.S. elites to preserve the unjust social order they had violently erected in prior centuries. That legacy has spanned decades into the present day.
One of the most widespread and devastating eugenicist weapons has been state-imposed sterilization to rid society of “socially inadequate” members. In March 1924, Virginia lawmakers passed a law that authorized the forced sterilization of people confined to government asylums because they were deemed “feebleminded.” In the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld...
Related Articles
By Walt Bogdanich and Carson Kessler, The New York Times | 10.23.2024
By 2021, nearly 2,000 volunteers had answered the call to test an experimental Alzheimer’s drug known as BAN2401. For the drugmaker Eisai, the trial was a shot at a windfall — potentially billions of dollars — for defanging a disease...
By Deena Beasley, Reuters | 09.28.2024
Student Zoe Davis, 20, was just weeks into her junior year when she landed back in the hospital with severe sickle cell pain earlier this month. She is doing what she can to prevent the crippling attacks in her arms...
By Ashleigh Wyss [cites CGS' Katie Hasson], Listnr | 10.09.2024
Discovering your genetic history can be as simple as spitting into a test tube, but what happens when your data ends up in the wrong hands?
With at-home DNA test kits becoming increasingly popular throughout the 2010s, curious consumers have...
By Tomoko Otake, The Japan Times | 10.17.2024
Screening embryos during in-vitro fertilization to select those with fewer genetic risks for common diseases and certain physical traits is technologically and ethically questionable, a group of researchers have said in a new study.
The Japan Society of Obstetrics and...