The Dangerous Resurgence of “Bad Genes” Language
By Susan A. Nolan and Michael Kimball,
Psychology Today
| 10. 30. 2024
In 2021, the American Psychological Association (APA) published a resolution: Apology to People of Color for APA’s Role in Promoting, Perpetuating, and Failing to Challenge Racism, Racial Discrimination, and Human Hierarchy in the U.S. In this document, the APA outlined the role that White male psychologists played in bolstering White supremacy and systemic racism through the eugenics movement in the early 1900s.
According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, eugenics “is the scientifically inaccurate theory that humans can be improved through selective breeding of populations.” This scientific racism uses the dangerous illogic of eugenics to provide credibility for long-debunked ideas that White Europeans are genetically superior to “non-[W]hite people whose social and economic status have been historically marginalized.” This unscientific sleight of hand requires discussion of ideas—about the “good genes” that White people supposedly have and the “bad genes” that others supposedly have—that are not supported by research or evidence.
Emma Wolverton, Eugenics, and “Feeblemindedness”
Science journalist Carl Zimmer traces the history of eugenics in the United States in his powerful book, She Has Her Mother’s...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
By Dalton Conley, The New York Times | 03.13.2025
Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences.
Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter...
By Jamie Ducharme, TIME | 03.06.2025
After struggling for eight years to have a baby, Shannon Petersen and her husband decided to try in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2022. Their fertility doctor recommended a test that sounded like exactly what they needed. It promised to help...
By Jason Wilson, The Guardian | 03.03.2025
A natalist conference featuring speakers including self-described eugenicists and promoters of race science, apparently including the man behind a previously pseudonymous race-science influencer account, and the founder of a startup offering IQ screening for IVF embryos, will be held at...