Crossing An Ethical Boundary
By Marcy Darnovsky,
The Journal of Life Sciences
| 05. 19. 2008
What prompted the recent headlines about genetically-modified human embryos? Why did a brief account of an experiment at Cornell University, presented last fall at an American Society for Reproductive Medicine conference and then published without fanfare in its journal Fertility and Sterility, suddenly make news around the world?
The work in question involved transferring a gene that codes for a fluorescing protein into a non-viable human embryo, and showing that all the cells in the embryo glowed after three days of cell division. As one of the research team's members later acknowledged, it was the first time that scientists are known to have created a genetically-modified human embryo.
Strangely, the study stayed beneath the public and media radar for months. It was brought to the attention of the UK's Sunday Times by Dr. David King, director of the British organization Human Genetics Alert, who came across it recently while reading a document prepared by the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The story ran in the May 11 Sunday Times and was then picked up by the Associated Press and...
Related Articles
By Fyodor Urnov, Time | 08.12.2024
After a lifetime in the field of epigenetics, and nearly 20 years after my colleagues and I coined the term “genome editing,” I will be the first to admit that describing the “epigenome”—a marvelous biological process that guides...
By Joy Zhang, Progress Educational Trust | 08.12.2024
What do China's new ethical guidlines tell us about the country's changing attitude to human genome editing? Professor Joy Zhang reads between the lines...
Recently, China's National Science and Technology Ethics Committee introduced a new set of ethics guidelines on...
By Priyanka Runwal, Chemical and Engineering News | 08.05.2024
Saritee Sanodiya, 26, has spent countless days wondering if she’ll ever live a “normal” life. Growing up, Sanodiya often missed school, frequenting the hospital for sudden, life-threatening drops in her hemoglobin levels and excruciating pain in her joints. High fever...
It’s been a busy couple of months in biopolitics, with developments in the US, UK, China, Japan, and implicitly on Mars. Time for a brief roundup.
• • •
Bioethics needs an update
The National Research Act is now 50 years old. It was signed into law on July 12, 1974, as a direct response to publicity about the 1932 “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” The Hastings Bioethics Forum celebrated its anniversary with an...