Consider Ethical Questions of 'Designer Babies'
By Elizabeth M. Meade,
The Morning Call
| 03. 10. 2014
A recent
New York Times article (Feb. 25) on a new fertility procedure that involves using the genetic material of three people to create a baby does a very good job of outlining the major ethical challenges posed by the technique.
The procedure is intended to produce children free of certain genetic defects, by replacing the mitochondria of the egg with the mitochondria of a donor who is free of the genetic defect. It could potentially be a godsend to families who risk passing certain catastrophic genetic defects on to their children. But, as The Times article rightly points out, it raises the ethical questions of whether we should be designing our children to be free of whatever we consider to be defects.
"Designer babies," as they are often called, represent both the best and worst of our understanding of parenthood. Several techniques already allow us to prevent passing genetic defects on to the next generation.
For years, fertility clinics have been able to screen embryos for genetic defects before implanting them; in some cases, halting or slowing the prevalence...
Related Articles
By Ali Breland, The Atlantic | 08.20.2024
“Joining us now is Steve Sailer, who I find to be incredibly interesting, and one of the most talented noticers,” Charlie Kirk said on his internet show in October. Kirk, the 30-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, a right-wing...
By Megan Agnew, The Times | 09.15.2024
Faith Hartley always wanted two girls — a blonde and a redhead. “I thought, I’ll have one that looks like me,” says Hartley, 35, smoothing her golden hair in the Los Angeles valley home she shares with her husband, Neil...
By Emily R. Klancher Merchant, Los Angeles Review of Books | 08.22.2024
IN THE Operation Varsity Blues scandal of 2019, 50 wealthy parents were charged with trying to get their children into elite universities through fraudulent means. The story dramatically demonstrated the lengths to which some parents will go to ensure their...
By Julia Brown, The Conversation | 08.16.2024
With their primary goal to advance scientific knowledge, most scientists are not trained or incentivized to think through the societal implications of the technologies they are developing. Even in genomic medicine, which is geared toward benefiting future patients, time and...