Kaiser Permanente's Genetic Database Is Boon to Medical Research
By Emily Anthes,
Bloomberg Businessweek
| 09. 25. 2014
Untitled Document
Over the past decade, Kaiser Permanente has spent more than $4 billion building the world’s largest private-sector collection of electronic health-care records. The data have become the cornerstone of a new scientific resource: a biobank that links the health records of more than 210,000 Kaiser members with samples of their DNA. The Oakland (Calif.)-based health network has teamed up with the University of California at San Francisco so scientists can use the collection to search for the genetic roots of diseases including glaucoma and prostate cancer.
Kaiser has 9.5 million enrollees in eight states and the District of Columbia, and members can see a wide variety of medical specialists without leaving the network. Every visit, lab test, prescription, and procedure is logged into a member’s electronic health record. This gives Kaiser an edge over other genomics projects, which besides collecting DNA samples must go through the expense and trouble of amassing information on subjects’ medical history. Last year biologist Craig Venter founded Human Longevity, with plans to sequence the genomes of as many as 100,000 people annually, and this summer,...
Related Articles
By Katie Palmer and Usha Lee McFarling, Stat | 09.03.2024
Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash
Pediatrician Alexandra Epee-Bounya had had enough. In her 20 years caring for children in Boston, she had seen hundreds of kids with suspected urinary tract infections. Each time, she’d turn to a...
By Emily R. Klancher Merchant, Los Angeles Review of Books | 08.22.2024
IN THE Operation Varsity Blues scandal of 2019, 50 wealthy parents were charged with trying to get their children into elite universities through fraudulent means. The story dramatically demonstrated the lengths to which some parents will go to ensure their...
By Julia Brown, The Conversation | 08.16.2024
With their primary goal to advance scientific knowledge, most scientists are not trained or incentivized to think through the societal implications of the technologies they are developing. Even in genomic medicine, which is geared toward benefiting future patients, time and...
By Antonio Regalado, MIT Technology Review | 08.22.2024
In 2016, I attended a large meeting of journalists in Washington, DC. The keynote speaker was Jennifer Doudna, who just a few years before had co-invented CRISPR, a revolutionary method of changing genes that was sweeping across biology labs because...