Upholding of WARF stem cell patent reversed
By The Business Journal of Milwaukee,
The Business Journal of Milwaukee
| 05. 03. 2010
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Board of Appeals and Interference has reversed an earlier decision from the Patent Office's re-examination division that upheld the claims of one of the stem cell lines held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
The patent covers one of the three key stem cell lines that were challenged through re-examination proceedings initiated in October 2006 at the request of consumer watchdog groups New York City-based Public Patent Foundation and the Santa Monica, Calif.-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, now called Consumer Watchdog.
The re-examination division upheld the validity of the patents in mid-2008, and the groups were allowed to challenge one of the patents in an appeal to the Board of Appeals and Interference.
The groups argue that the work done by University of Wisconsin researcher James Thomson to isolate stem cell lines was obvious in the light of previous scientific research, making his work unpatentable. The groups claimed the three WARF patents were "impeding scientific progress and driving vital stem cell research overseas."
The patent office rejected the arguments by the groups...
Related Articles
By Jim Thomas, Scan the Horizon | 11.19.2024
It’s the wee hours of 2nd November 2024 in Cali, Colombia. In a large UN negotiating hall Colombian Environment Minister Susana Muhamed has slammed down the gavel on a decision that should send a jolt through the AI policy world. ...
By Ewan Bolton, The Telegraph | 11.12.2024
Fertility agencies offering embryo selection for IVF and surrogacy have been accused of promoting eugenics and misleading consumers about the power of genetic screening.
Some American clinics claim they can “rank” embryos for IVF using Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenic...
By Ned Pagliarulo, BioPharmaDive | 11.05.2024
A medicine built around a more precise form of CRISPR gene editing appeared to work as designed in its first clinical trial test, developer Beam Therapeutics said Tuesday. But the death of a trial participant could renew concerns about an older...
By Fyodor Urnov, The CRIPSR Journal | 10.18.2024
The field of clinical gene editing has a bona fide crisis on its hands—a crisis that has to, and can be, promptly resolved.
An outside observer of our field might be surprised by this and say—what crisis? The first...